While technical
communicators and scholars have called for more studies between the
intersections of rhetoric and technical communication, in this article, Todd writes that they haven’t done much
with the canon of invention, and what has been done with that canon comes only
from classical rhetoric. His article discusses what Burke has to add to these
discussions. The article focuses on how Burke might be used in the technical
communication classroom and other settings, and mentions several Burkean terms
like the pentad, ambiguities, propoedentic or nimbleness of thought, limits of
agreement, joycing or what Todd calls etymological extension, finding the complex
in the simple, expanding the circumference, and four master tropes, all of which
are shown to be invention strategies. Personally, I am surprised that Burke’s
notion of form is missing here, but I will have to perhaps write something that
adds to this discussion as well.
Jeff Todd. 2000. Burkean Invention in Technical Communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, January 2000; vol. 30, 1: pp. 81-96.
No comments:
Post a Comment